Monday, January 30, 2012

SSRJ #1 Faulkner


Initial Personal Reaction

My initial reaction to Faulkner’s “A Rose for Emily” is that I also felt the same as the narrator of the story.  I felt like saying poor Emily as she is from this rich family with a controlling father that Emily did what she had to as a coping mechanism for the void she had in her life.  She experienced nothing and felt nothing, and with her status did not feel any remorse for unlawful things that she has done.  It was sad  that the town let her get away with things such as not paying taxes, sprinkling lime to get rid of the smell, and even letting her buy the arsenic even though they knew better.  It makes me think about how some parents allow their children get away with things or even lie to another family member to save face.   
 

Literary Element/Thematic Analysis  

Faulkner’s use of motifs to convey Emily’s status resulting in her isolation, loneliness, and the town’s excuses in the story of “A Rose for Emily” reinforces the author’s ideas about how it is the human nature to yearn for love and affection in Emily’s unlawful way of attaining it.   The story’s first paragraph used Emily’s full name showing her importance with the entire town attending her funeral to pay their respect to “a fallen monument”.   He also described her house as being decorated with cupolas and spires with scrolled balconies and that the house had once been in the most “select street”.  The author described Miss Emily as tradition and a “hereditary obligation” to the town that her family was excused from taxes.  This proved to me that the town held her family so highly that they let them be above the law.  This perception of being above the law, and high in society allowed Miss Emily to do whatever she pleased with no concern for the law.  The town people just reacts to Miss Emily as “poor Emily” as their excuse to allow her to do what she wanted to do.  The town has also seen what Emily has gone through with her father oppressing her from finding love as their family was too good for commoners or Yankees.  Miss Emily likely learned to suppress her feelings then from any man due to her father.  When her father passed she had a difficult time coping with reality as the only thing she had left was the house and no social skills of her own.  It is tragic that the only man that she was allowed to love was her father, and when he passed she could not let go of him until she was forced to. 

When the town saw her again, they described her looking like an “angel” in colored church windows that depicted both tragedy and serenity while still holding her in high standards.  The author used angel as a sign of status or above the law or godly while saying it is tragic as Miss Emily life does seem tragic especially when the author used “Poor Emily” throughout the story allowing the reader to feel sorry for her.  She finally met a man different than her father when she was in her thirties.  The author described him as a “Yankee” foreman, who the town saw as the man changing the town with construction and his image as being loud, cracking jokes, and the little boys following him along cussing. With the town holding on to tradition of Miss Emily’s status they did not allow the Yankee, as they learned he was not a “marrying man” involvement with Miss Emily, go any further.  Miss Emily was then further suppressed due to her status in her quest for yearning for love.  I believe Miss Emily snapped and used what she know, which is her own status to finally get what she wanted.  What she wanted was the Yankee, even though he was not a marrying man and not traditional, so she poisoned him to be with her for as long as she lived without the town questioning her.  With all these suppression to maintain status quo, Miss Emily found a way to use her status as a way to get back to the town with the town continuing to make excuses for her until she died.  The town’s judge even protected Miss Emily from the town’s complaint of the smell of her house by sprinkling limes at night to get rid of the smell.  I believe the town knew what happened to the Yankee since at the end of the story the townspeople knew of the room.  The town had waited until Miss Emily was in the ground before it was opened out of respect to her status.  It was there in the room they saw what Miss Emily lived for was the affection of the man she wanted in the status they all wanted.  She had dressed the poisoned Yankee in the nightshirt she bought, with the monogrammed toiletry showing symbol of the status they wanted him to have as well as the suit.  She got the love the only way she could figure out how.  In the end, Miss Emily got away with murder as the town that symbolized her status always protected and made excuses for her actions.

To conclude, I believe the author used Miss Emily’s status to show her isolation from the real world (the town) while allowing her to be above the law (not paying taxes and murder).  At the same time, he wanted us to feel some empathy throughout as he mentioned “poor Emily” several times as well as allow us to see what she really yearned for which was her way of getting her “love” that she isolated herself for.
 
So my question is, does society drive those people who we regard high and mighty (i.e politicians, religious leaders, doctors, stars..) to do unlawful things since society makes excuses?